A bill approved by Michigan lawmakers will repeal a state law that has shielded pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits stemming from the safety and efficacy of their products.
MICHIGAN—A state law that prevents Michiganders from suing pharmaceutical companies over potentially dangerous or defective drugs is set to be erased from the books in Michigan.
The state Senate last week voted to approve legislation to eliminate a provision in state law that makes manufacturers or sellers of drugs immune from product liability under certain situations—which effectively prevents Michiganders from holding them accountable in court.
Michigan is the only state in the nation with laws that specifically protect Big Pharma from product liability. State lawmakers said repealing the provision will force more companies to accept responsibility when they “knowingly defraud and harm” the public.
“Restoring accountability for drug companies has been a goal of mine throughout my time in the Legislature,” sponsoring Sen. Jeff Irwin (D-Ann Arbor) said in a statement last week. “By repealing our state’s immunity law for the drug industry, SB 410 will restore accountability to drug manufacturers and vital access to justice for our state and its people.”
Currently, drug companies are immune from product liability in Michigan as long as their products are properly labeled and approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration, and if the company didn’t fraudulently obtain approval by bribing someone or lying about their drugs.
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel said the limitations have hindered her ability to investigate drug companies that contribute to the opioid epidemic or price gouge for insulin, as well as limited the recovery of taxpayer dollars paid out from the Medicaid program due to fraud.
“While my Department was ultimately successful in litigating claims against a host of opioid defendants, the existence of this unique provision greatly complicated the approach,” Nessel said in a statement. “I applaud the legislature for finally addressing this one-of-a-kind bill that placed protections for large corporations over the safety of Michigan residents.”
In 2011, Attorney General Mike Cox’s lawsuit against Merck for $20 million was reportedly dismissed under immunity protection. In 2020, a court also dismissed claims of negligence and public nuisance against opioid distributors, again citing immunity protection in state law. Local governments have faced similar barriers in their litigation against pharmaceutical companies.
According to a legislative analysis, the existing state law has also prevented Michiganders (including Nessel) from participating in national class-action lawsuits and from filing complaints against pharmaceutical companies. Under the bill, legal recourse would become an option—including the ability to recover damages if faulty drugs lead to injuries or death.
The bill is now headed to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s desk to be signed into law.
“For too long, residents and loved ones who were harmed by the very medicines that were supposed to help them have had no legal recourse, even as courts have awarded millions of dollars to residents and communities everywhere else around the nation,” Sen. Sue Shink (D-Northfield Twp.) said in a statement after the bill was passed. “Today’s action, and strong bipartisanship behind it, are a major win for Michigan and our Senate majority for the people.”
READ MORE: Dems to stop Big Pharma from gouging Michiganders for drugs
For the latest Michigan news, follow The ‘Gander on Twitter.
Follow Political Correspondent Kyle Kaminski here.
Author
Support Our Cause
Thank you for taking the time to read our work. Before you go, we hope you'll consider supporting our values-driven journalism, which has always strived to make clear what's really at stake for Michiganders and our future.
Since day one, our goal here at The 'Gander has always been to empower people across the state with fact-based news and information. We believe that when people are armed with knowledge about what's happening in their local, state, and federal governments—including who is working on their behalf and who is actively trying to block efforts aimed at improving the daily lives of Michigan families—they will be inspired to become civically engaged.
‘Big beautiful bill’ will end Medicaid for people in Bay and Saginaw counties this year. Here’s how many will lose it—and who’s responsible
The district includes Flint and the Tri-Cities, and faces some of the most severe challenges in the state as a result of Trump’s tax bill. The...
‘Big beautiful bill’ will end Medicaid for people in Ingham, Shiawassee, and Livingston counties this year. Here’s how many will lose it—and who’s responsible
The representative who voted to take away health care from nearly 14,000 Michiganders in his district has been dodging constituents’ questions and...
‘Big beautiful bill’ will end Medicaid for people in Kalamazoo, Holland, and Battle Creek this year. Here’s how many will lose it—and who’s responsible
The representative who voted to take away health care from nearly 15,000 Michiganders in his district is “looking forward” to announcing his...
‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ will cost Michiganders money in 2025—here’s how much, and who’s responsible
From higher utility bills to job cuts across multiple industries, Michiganders can expect their wallets to feel a little thinner this year—and in...
‘Big beautiful bill:’ Here’s how many people will see higher monthly bills in Lansing, South Lyon, and Howell this year—and the politician who let it happen
District 7 faces more than $565 million in financial losses tied to GOP-supported spending cuts. Michiganders living near Lansing will lose more...
