Here’s what you had to say:
“No this information should not be stored or shared. What has happened to us? The erosion of our freedom continues.” â David Hanna
“License plate data is already available through the Secretary of State to police agencies. Other agencies if they have a warrant can get that data already. The Trump efforts to make the United States a police state run by him is unacceptable. I would do everything in my power to prevent that.” â Alice Whiren
“I do not feel that police or other government agencies have any right to track my license plate unless there is a warrant for that information. The information should also not be stored or shared with other departments and agencies.“ â Laura McDonald
“I am ok with these readers. I think they are worthwhile.” â Dona Delmotte
“No. Michigan should resist becoming a surveillance state.” â William Sievert
“Michigan should absolutely use the license plate readers to help solve crime and catch criminals and that includes sharing them with other agencies such as state, sheriff, fbi, cbp and ice. A criminal is a criminal and we should be more worried about law abiding citizens and their safety than criminals and illegals. People are tired of that type of backward thinking. ” â Karen Parnell
“I’ve worked in high-tech fields for pretty much my entire working life. I understand how data is collected, transmitted, analyzed and stored.
No, I do not want any type of camera scanning public areas for license plate or biometric data.
This type of data is ripe for abuse.
Questions for the various communities that have contracted with Flock, Axon or any of the other providers: