News

New Poll: Michiganders Want More Birth Control Access, Not Less

All three Republican candidates for Michigan Attorney General recently said they believed that a Supreme Court ruling allowing married couples to buy and use contraception without risk of prosecution was wrongly decided.

Image via Unsplash

All three Republican candidates for Michigan Attorney General recently said they believed that a Supreme Court ruling allowing married couples to buy and use contraception without risk of prosecution was wrongly decided.

Need to Know

  • 77% of Michigan voters oppose limiting access to birth control and only 9% of Michigan voters believe states should be able to ban or limit access to contraceptives such as condoms and birth control pills, which help people avoid unwanted pregnancies.
  • All three GOP candidates for AGโ€”Former House Speaker Tom Leonard, state Rep. Ryan Berman, and attorney Matthew DePernoโ€”all said they believed a Supreme Court ruling allowing married couples to buy and use contraception without risk of prosecution was wrongly decided.ย 
  • 43% of voters said theyโ€™d be less likely to support the GOP candidates after hearing about their opposition to the Supreme Court ruling protecting access to contraceptives.

MICHIGANโ€”Seventy-seven percent of Michigan voters oppose banning or limiting access to contraceptives, an idea that has been embraced by all three Republican candidates for state Attorney General.

The finding comes via a new poll from Progress Michigan and Public Policy Polling, which also found that only 9% of MIchigan voters believe states should be able to ban or limit access to contraceptives such as condoms and birth control pills, which help people avoid unwanted pregnancies. Another 14% of registered voters said they werenโ€™t sure. 

The results of the poll show that โ€œMichigan voters refuse to fall for Republican misinformation,โ€ and โ€œremain firmly on the sideโ€ of reproductive freedom, according to Lonnie Scott, executive director of Progress Michigan. 

The question was prompted by a jarring moment at the end of last monthโ€™s debate among the three Republican candidates vying to be the partyโ€™s nominee for the Attorney General (AG) position. The candidates were asked if they supported the Supreme Courtโ€™s 1965 ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut, which struck down Connecticutโ€™s ban on the sale of contraception and banned the prosecution of married couples for using contraception based on the right to marital privacy. 

In response, former House Speaker Tom Leonard (R-DeWitt), state Rep. Ryan Berman (R-Commerce Twp) and Kalamazoo-based attorney Matthew DePerno all said they believed the case was wrongly decided and overstepped on statesโ€™ rights.

โ€œThis case, much like Roe v. Wade, I believe, was wrongly decided,โ€ Leonard said. โ€œIt was an issue that trampled statesโ€™ rights and it was an issue that should have been left up to the states.โ€ 

Berman echoed Leonardโ€™s stance and said the Court had engaged in โ€œjudicial activismโ€ by supporting the right to contraception. DePerno, who has spread lies about the outcome of the 2020 election and has been endorsed by former President Donald Trump, then delivered a screed about the importance of โ€œstates rightsโ€ and told Michigan citizens to โ€œhold the lineโ€ against the federal government.

Incumbent AG Dana Nessel, a Democrat, quickly jumped on candidatesโ€™ embrace of a fringe position, calling it โ€œterrifying.โ€

โ€œAll 3 Republicans running for Michigan Attorney General just stated that they oppose the ruling in Griswold v Connecticut which outlawed prosecuting married couples for using contraception,โ€ she wrote in a tweet. 

Leonard and Berman later walked back their remarks to an extent, according to The Detroit News. Leonard said states should not ban contraceptives, while Berman claimed not to oppose contraception. Still, both continue to say the Court got the decision wrong. 

Whether access to contraception becomes a key issue or not in the AG race remains to be seen. If it does, it could be a major vulnerability for the Republicans.

Forty-three percent of Michigan voters said theyโ€™d be less likely to support the Republican candidates after hearing about their opposition to the Supreme Court ruling protecting access to contraceptives, according to the Progress Michigan/Public Policy Polling survey. Conversely, only 16% said theyโ€™d be more likely to vote for the candidates, while 33% said it doesnโ€™t make a difference and 8% werenโ€™t sure. 

This fallโ€™s general election will take place on Nov. 8. You can register to vote here or learn more about the elections here.